WebOn 5 July 1872, Swaffield sent a horse on a Great Northern Railway Company (‘GMRC’) railway line to himself at Sandy Station. The fare was prepaid. When the horse arrived at Sandy Station at 10pm there was no one to receive it. The station master directed that the horse be taken to a nearby stable for the night. WebApr 2, 2013 · Wakeirn V. London And South Western Railway Co. Definition of Wakeirn V. London And South Western Railway Co. ( (1886), 12 A. C. 41). In an action for negligence the onus is on the plaintiff to prove the negligence and that the injury complained of resulted from it.The plaintiff's husband was found lying dead...
Agent Of Necessity LAW416 ASSIGNMNET 2 - Studocu
WebGreat Northern Railway Co v Swaffield states that where impossible to get principal’s instructions, the agent’s action is necessary to prevent loss and the agent has acted in … WebSee Page 1. Great Northern Railway Co. v Swaffield 4 Brief facts The plaintiff had transported a horse to a station on behalf of the defendant. When the horse arrived there was no one to receive it / collect it. The plaintiff sent the horse to the stables and for a number of months paid the stable charges. The plaintiff made a claim to recover ... small houses with carports
The Great Western Railway SpringerLink
WebApr 3, 2013 · In Great Northern Railway v Swaffield a horse was sent by rail and on its arrival at its destination there was no one to collect it. GNR incurred the expense of … WebSep 1, 2024 · – Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield. Facts: Swaffield arranged for a horse to be transported to himself care of a railway station owned by the plaintiffs. The horse arrived at the station however Swaffield was not there to meet it. As the plaintiffs could not contact Swaffield before nightfall and had no facilities to accommodate the ... WebAug 17, 2010 · [152] Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54, 76–77. Earlier, at 74, the Court contrasted the Australian position with the UK’s approach where the leading authority (then, Kuruma v The Queen [1955] AC 197) held that the discretion to exclude real evidence unlawfully obtained was part of the general discretion which always exists to exclude … sonic idw comic tails